🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to approve a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," said the European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Previously, interest built behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. One foundation established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful online content contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," stated a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the local government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to copy this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this global debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that states around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.